As a major in History (Finance minor), I have many opinions on history and how it is presented.
Sadly, most people do not understand history except for what they have learned in High School and on the History Channel. Nothing against the History Channel, but High School history is near worthless. Dates and historical figures, memorize and puke it back up for the test and forget. Typical history, and what most people believe it to be, simply dates.
WRONG. In my upper level courses, my Professors do not even know most dates, nor do we study them really, at all. What we learn is historiography (yeah it’s real), which is the study of how history is studied (lol). Weird, yes, but interesting to see the bias of the past, the norms, and the characters at the time.
Take Abe Lincoln the “Emancipator”. Let it be known, Lincoln only wanted to stop the spread of slavery and would have actually permitted it to continue within the South if the South would’ve stopped bitching about the expansion of slavery into the newly acquired territories (from Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican-American War).
Honest Abe has left some nasty quotes behind for us historians to analyze, take this for example. In an on-going debate with Douglas, Lincoln at Charleston, Illinois in Sept. 1858, said this:
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races … I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together in social and political equality.” (Gienapp, 50)
This is what ABE LINCOLN stated. Just goes to show how the politics and social constructs of the time majorly influences the outcomes of history.
Food for thought… more later, surely.
Source : Gienapp, William E. The Civil War and Reconstruction: A Documentary Collection. W.W. Norton: New York, 2001.